翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Mubila ・ R v Nedrick ・ R v Negus ・ R v Neil ・ R v Nette ・ R v Noble ・ R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society ・ R v Nur ・ R v O'Connor ・ R v O'Grady ・ R v Oakes ・ R v Oickle ・ R v Coney ・ R v Constanza ・ R v Cook ・ R v Coote ・ R v Coulson, Brooks and others ・ R v Creighton ・ R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd ・ R v Cuerrier ・ R v Cunningham ・ R v Darrach ・ R v Daviault ・ R v Davidson ・ R v Davis ・ R v DB ・ R v Dear ・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ・ R v Dersch ・ R v DeSousa Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Coote ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Coote ''R v Coote'' is a Canadian constitutional law court decision dealing with the powers of the provinces under the ''Constitution Act, 1867''〔(''Constitution Act, 1867'', 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3. (U.K.). )〕 (formerly the ''British North America Act, 1867''). The point in issue was whether Quebec had the constitutional authority to create a mandatory inquiry power for provincial fire commissioners. The case was ultimately decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the court of last resort for Canada within the British Empire. It was the first decision by the Judicial Committee interpreting the ''Constitution Act, 1867''. The Judicial Committee held that the mandatory inquiry power was within provincial authority. The Judicial Committee also held that evidence given by an individual in response to a mandatory inquiry could later be used as evidence against that individual in a criminal prosecution for arson. == Facts of the Case == In 1871, there was a fire in the warehouse owned by the accused, Edward Coote, in Montreal, Quebec. Fire commissioners appointed under provincial law investigated the fire. In the course of their investigation, they twice interrogated Mr. Coote. Under the authority granted by provincial law, Mr. Coote was required to respond to the questions of the fire commissioners. Subsequently, Mr. Coote was charged with four counts of arson with intent to defraud various insurance companies. He was tried before a single judge of the Quebec Court of Queen's Bench, sitting with a jury. The Crown successfully entered the two depositions in evidence. The jury convicted Mr. Coote. The trial judge reserved questions of law for the full Court to consider, including the validity of the provincial statute and the admissibility of the depositions in evidence against the accused.〔''R v Coote'', pp. 604-605 (L.R.), pp. 1-2 (UKPC).〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Coote」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.